Thursday, October 9, 2008

Sequential Art: Huh?

Hi. David here. There are a few things I think about a LOT. Ranking about fifth on the list (just under Casey and the eternal question of whether my desire for coffee has actually become an addiction at this point) is sequential art. If you know what that is, you probably know where I'm going with this already. But I figure most of you are trying to piece together what I'm talking about.

Here's Scott McCloud's definition:
Juxtaposed pictorial and other images in deliberate sequence, intended to convey information and/or to produce an aesthetic response in the viewer.

Scott McCloud,
Understanding Comics
It's really completely unfair of me to introduce you to Scott McCloud through a chunky definition like that. McCloud's Understanding Comics was one of two comic books that were required reading for me in art school. On the right is an example of how McCloud really reads, and I would encourage everyone, their grandmother, and her dog to check out his book.

But I digress. What I wanted to talk about was sequential art - or, if you will - comics.

The word comics is loaded up with connotations like cheesy, fanboy, spandex, WHAM!, POW!, juvenile, and what-are-you-even-talking-about-comics-for-anyway? But artists with their ear to the ground are aware that Comics are a lot bigger than Action Man and the Monster of Doom.

Over the next few days, I want to introduce you to the world of sequential art, and ask/answer a few important questions, like "What?" "Why?" "Who?" and the very important "Who cares?" ... but most of all, I want to talk to you about the relationship between Christianity and sequential art; a relationship that has been chilly on both sides. I want to break the ice.

More on this very soon (tomorrow, unless things blow up). For now, let me link you to the World Magazine cover story about Christians and graphic novels (long form sequential art).

We'll talk soon. See you in the funny papers. +David

No comments: