Thursday, September 25, 2008

Peder Mørk Mønsted & Anneka Tran

Okay, so here's the thing about me and landscape painters. We don't always get along. I'm not sure what it is... I know plenty of people who love landscapes. I have yet to delve into the depths of my inner being and find out why I just find so many landscapes ... er ... boring.

However. Today, I have discovered a notable exception. Peder Mørk Mønsted.

Again, I just met Peder (Danish, 1859-1941) this morning, so I haven't had a chance to analyze his work yet beyond the fact that I really really like it. I'll let you know if I come up with anything more profound.

I do, however, know what I like about the sophisticated, childlike work of Anneka Tran (UK, contemporary). With an easy line and a sweet simplicity, she creates instantly identifiable and yet still original images that make you think and/or smile.

There's an innocence and originality to her work that avoids being schmaltzy and comes across instead as very playful and fresh. I'm a new fan.

Here at Art&God&Art, we're all about redeemed art ... the art of the Christian. I think one way a Christian can create great art is by looking at beautiful art in the rest of the world. (Generalization, not categorical statement.) So, enjoy these two artists. I know I am! +David

Links in this post (via linesandcolors and drawn!):
Peder Mørk Mønsted - Gallery on The Athenaeum
Anneka Tran - Personal website

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

The Peasant Princess

Mark Driscoll of Mars Hill Baptist Church is a controversial figure, to say the least. People tend to have very strong opinions about him and his ministry, one way or another. But whatever your stance is, this video announcing his church's new study of the Song of Solomon is some very attractive Christian art.


I'll probably have the music in my head all day. +David

(Link via Challies.)

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Christians Skew Redemption

Christian artists skew towards themes of redemption. I've become convinced of this as a basic principle (with its own assortment of exceptions) over the last few months of more frequent interactions with young Christian poets, storytellers, and visual artists. It began about six months ago when I sat down with a seventeen-year-old mentoree to work on the plot of her epic fantasy.

"What are you most passionate about?" I asked. "What's most real to you?"
"Well, God is, really."
"Then let's build your story around that reality and see how it goes."

How it went was something radically different than the plan she had started with, because her original plan featured children who save the world. That's common enough, but not nearly God-centered enough for what she really wanted. As we worked on the story together over the course of three months, new events and themes began to emerge, ones which were exciting and fresh, and best of all captured her heart. It became a story about children who try to save the world and fail, because they put their faith in a magical object rather than the story's equivalent of Christ. This is definitely not Harry Potter. But it turns out all right, because eventually the character who stands for Christ bursts on to the scene and then things really start to happen.

Too allegorical, you say? Well, it is perhaps more allegorical than formerly, but formerly it was also anti-biblical and anti-reality. In reality and in the Bible, human beings (especially children) don't defeat the forces of evil and save the world. Did the shepherd boy David defeat Goliath? No, silly. God did that. Who rescues Narnia (in the books, I mean, not the movies)? Aslan. Or, more to the point, who saved my soul when I knew I was already dead? He, the Christ. And do any of those seem "too allegorical"? For myself, I say "Why, no! Not at all!"

Still in defense of allegory, have you ever noticed that a huge percent of the great literature we have from the most intensely Christian era of history that we know about (c. 500-1700 A.D.) was allegorical? Fact. One might argue, and I intend to argue at some point, that allegory is a form naturally suited to the expression of Christian themes. We live our lives on two planes of reality, engaged at all times in joys, sufferings, and struggles which are often called "invisible" or "abstract," but are actually as real and present and as much a part of life as butter on the breakfast table. Allegory reflects all of this: the two planes, the depiction of the "invisible" inward life, and so on.

But to return. After that meeting with my mentoree, the same idea kept recurring. I was on the phone with an aspiring Christian moviemaker. It resurfaced. I was talking to a young but extraordinarily gifted Christian poetess. It resurfaced. For work, I had to write up a brief survey of the Most Common Themes of Christian literature down through the ages. Oh. My. You can't get away from the theme of redemption!

What struck me most was the repetition of these words (or as near as makes no difference) in the conversations that I was having with my contemporaries: "I just can't see doing something that ends badly" or "I'm just not satisfied with it if things don't turn around for the best" or "What I really want to write/compose/film/draw is a story where things are bad, but then they become wonderful."

Why?

I submit to you, reader, that it is because you write/compose/film/draw what you know, what you yourself have most deeply experienced, and what you are most passionate about. All artists do. And, for Christians, the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ is the central fact of our lives. The word "Christian" means "little Christ." There's just no getting away from it; given the choice of anything in the world to portray artistically, Christian artists in my experience keep coming back to this one story, because nothing else satisfies our souls. And friend, I've just been talking about my contemporaries. If you start to dig back through the records of what Christians actually have portrayed artistically over the years, it will very quickly become apparent to you that the answer is "Jesus Christ, Redeemer" in big crimson letters.

Let me share with you what I learned from this realization.

First, I learned that I might as well stop kicking and go with it. I'm never going to want to write anything else, and I'll never be satisfied until I've done my personal best to display this story of redemption to the uttermost of my powers, to make everybody else as enthralled with it as I am.

Second, I learned that I'm not really feeling limited by this subject matter at all. It's a story as wide as the heavens and as varied as the individual hearthfires of the nations. I could spend my whole life telling and retelling it from various angles and in various ways, and never get past the millionth part of all there is to say.

Third, because the redemption story includes exactly the sort of things that human beings know are true but hate to say, it is a startlingly, cold-as-an-alpine-lake original story (that is, once you begin to really get wet with it instead of just contemplating the surface in a picture-postcard). Working with my mentoree showed me a little of how fresh and yet how penetrating a story can become when you adjust your sense of reality to center on God. What novelty there was in a fantasy not centered on a magical artifact, but on a supernatural hero!

Finally, I learned that this theme of redemption does not embarrass me. I don't feel like I have to whisper it or disguise it or somehow make it less obvious. No; rather I want to plunge into it and put it forward quivering with life. I think Gibson's The Passion proved that there is no such thing as one too many portrayals of this story, or that another one would be a cliche. Your artistic setting can be botched and make the gem seem less valuable than it is, but the answer to that problem is not "Throw away the gem." The answer is, "Become a better jeweler."

I'm captivated. Completely. And I won't rest until I've show the whole world why this is the most tragic, the most comic, the funniest, the saddest, the most ironic, and in sum the most beautiful story that any human knows of or could tell about. I skew towards redemption. I can't be really deeply passionate about anything else, and if I could, I wouldn't.

Now for the scary part: to become a better jeweler.

Christy

The things for which the words stand

I've been going through James Montgomery Boice's excellent commentary on Ephesians, and today came across a quote which could not be more relevant to our discussion.
In the early part of [the 20th century] B. B. Warfield, the distinguished professor of didactic and polemic theology at Princeton Theological Seminary, delivered an address to incoming students in which he argued that "there is no one of the titles of Christ which is more precious to Christian hearts than 'Redeemer.'" ...

In his address Warfield proved his thesis not, as we might suppose, by impressive theological arguments but by references to the church's hymns in which, he maintained, the true devotional heart of God's people is most evident... Warfield listed twenty-seven such selections...

...but to be faithful to his essay, I must acknowledge that toward the end of the message he bemoaned the fact that (even in his day) this was ceasing to be the case. On the one hand, the concepts had been under attack by liberal scholars who scorned the simple gospel of redemption and were trying to divest the great theological terms of Scripture of their meaning. On the other hand (although Warfield did not spell this out specifically), they were being neglected by Christian people. Maybe they were regarded as too theological, too abstract, or too impractical.

Warfield said, "It is a sad thing to see words like these die,... and I hope you will determine that, God helping you, you will not let them die thus, if any care on your part can preserve them in life and vigor. But the dying of the words is not the saddest thing which we see here. The saddest thing is the dying out of the hearts of men of the things for which the words stand. ...The real thing for you to settle in your minds, therefore, is whether Christ is truly a Redeemer to you..."
I don't think I could sum it up any better. +David

Friday, September 12, 2008

&Share: Pre-Game Coin Toss Makes Jaguars Realize Randomness of Life

When philosophy meets sports (it ain't pretty, folks).



RATING: One use of a mildly objectionable word.

In case anyone's confused: yes, this is a joke. Shared here because in 2 minutes and 41 seconds, this one video gives a better explanation of the heart of existentialism than voluminous articles. +David

(Link via Challies Dot Com)

&Link: Wordle


Here's something I love. Wordle.net takes any text you enter and creates a custom word cloud to show you the frequency of the words used.

Above is my Wordle of David's Psalms (with Lord removed due to huge prominence; you wouldn't be able to see anything else if I left it in). Although this is a great toy with endless possibilities for entertainment, I actually didn't create this because I was bored. I've been using it as an analysis tool to try and discover more about the way David talked and thought.

You can see more of my Wordles here.

(Detail from David's Psalms wordle)

Literary analysis through Web 2.0 toys. I love it. +David

Links in this post:
Wordle.net - Go ahead, give it a wordle.
David's Wordles - True confessions: I created the Al Mohler wordle because I lost the link to my own gallery, and that was the only way I could think of to find it. (It's a good blog, though.)

Monday, September 8, 2008

&Link: The Big Picture


The people behind The Big Picture aren't Christians, as far as I know, but the powerful images they present certainly make for some good [accidental] celebration of God's creation ... as well as some downright excellent photojournalism. I've linked here to an older post, Recent Volcanic Activity, but this is one to put on the blogroll. +David

Links:
The Big Picture - blog home page
Recent Volcanic Activity - an exceptional view of volcanoes, from up close to outer space

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

About the &Artists (Part 2)


Mercifully, I've never had to write my own blurb---at least, until now. But I have had practice in following my brother's lead, and that's almost always a good plan, so here goes:

"Christy began to write at age twelve because her mother told her she could. At the time she hated all forms of reading and writing, but was intrigued to hear that maybe she wasn't as dumb as she thought. Self-centeredness is a poor beginning for an artist; fortunately, that isn't where it ended. After five years of angry opposition to God, Christy was saved at age 15 and found that, of all things, God is beautiful. You'll be hearing more about that later.

"After receiving her B.A. in Literature, Christy became first the General Managing Editor of a small educational publishing company, then switched to her true love: staff authorship and direction of the high school literature track. Unlike David, she has no spare time (really!), but does truly enjoy this season of all-consuming work because it is clearly from God and also has a well-defined ending point: 2010! After that, who knows?"


David is the commercial sellout; I'm the worldviews-shaper. I can't believe that they let me mess with the minds of teenagers via literature, but incredibly that seems to be what God decided to do. David and I are both fascinated with communication, and like him my emphasis falls on what and how (not so much why) people communicate, especially in the medium of verbal art. I think I also tend to focus on what things mean in and of themselves: I'm the one for denotations and etymology, whereas David is the connotations guru.

David got me into Dostoevsky and Tolstoy, I got him into Dante (he spent a month mapping Hell for a class plan I was writing and fell in love with Dante's portrayal of the beauty of God's justice), and we got ourselves separately but equally into Vermeer.

I subscribe wholeheartedly to the principle that God has made incredible variety within unity which ought to be enjoyed as such, so there really isn't a form of art that I haven't been able to find a way to appreciate, if not for its celebration of truth, at least for its power and effectiveness. However, I do have a special place in my heart for the forgotten masterpieces of the Middle Ages, because that was when the nerves and flesh, breath and lifeblood of literature was infused with the soul of the Christian worldview.

I'm doing this blog because I believe that art---verbal, visual, audial, etc.---can powerfully communicate truth about God, sin, eternity, and humanity. More than that, I think that we as Christians need to regain a vision for literature of celebration---celebrating primarily this wonderful person---and very God of very God!---whose name is Christ.

I'm definitely NOT the driving force behind the many ampersands you'll see on this blog. However, I love the chiasmus pattern of A-B-A with God in the center surrounded by the word Art. Such patterns set off the thing in the middle, and that's what I hope this blog will do.

Since I'm not a typography genius like my kid brother, I'll just sign myself Christy.